Georgia Pedone vs Julie Struplova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Oct at 09:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Pedone vs J. Struplova

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pedone 1 - 0 Struplova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Georgia Pedone winning 2 and Julie Struplova winning 1. The last match between Georgia Pedone and Julie Struplova was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 25-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedone | 1 |
| Struplova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-25-25)
G. Pedone vs J. Struplova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.87% (136-99) | Career Total W/L | 66.95% (160-79) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Pedone vs J. Struplova Match Preview:
- Who has the better second serve? Julie Struplova edges out Georgia Pedone with 38.00% of points won on her second serve compared to 33.25% for Pedone.
- In terms of returning second serves, Struplova again shows a slight advantage, winning 53.06% of points compared to Pedone's 51.41%.
- When examining first serve return points, Pedone has a marginal advantage at 41.06% versus Struplova's 40.23%.
- Does performance under pressure matter? Struplova saves 51.14% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Pedone's 47.89%.
- How do overall match results compare? Over the past year, Struplova has a significantly higher win rate at 70.45% compared to Pedone's 50.00%.
- Both players excel on clay surfaces with a win rate of 58%. However, Pedone struggles more on hard surfaces than Struplova, who has yet to claim a win on this surface.
- When competing in tournaments >$10K, Struplova wins 66.67% of her matches, while Pedone achieves a win rate of 53.70%.
- Struplova's opponents have a lower average rank (408.36) compared to the slightly higher-ranked opponents (374.53) faced by Pedone.
- In deciding sets, Struplova's success rate rises to 71%, compared to Pedone's 55%, pointing to a stronger performance in high-stakes scenarios.
- For current event insights, analyzing recent matches of both players will offer further valuable insights to identify who's in top form.
Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):
Georgia Pedone and Julie Struplova present intriguing comparisons across various performance metrics in their upcoming match. Struplova has demonstrated superior second serve success, second serve returns, and break point saves. Her ability to deliver under pressure boosts her competitive edge.
Pedone maintains a small upper hand in returning first serve points and displays commendable deciding set victories, though weaker than Struplova's. Both players showcase equal proficiency on clay, their preferred surface.
However, the contrast in recent win rates is notable, with Struplova exhibiting stronger consistency and success over the last year. This, paired with her more frequent victories in pressure situations, suggests she's more likely to triumph in their head-to-head encounter.
Taking all factors into account, Julie Struplova is predicted to be the favored contender for this match.
Georgia Pedone vs Julie Struplova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Pedone vs J. Struplova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 3:9:27 | Average Match Time | 3:9:27 |
| 85% (79/93) | 1st Serve % | 70% (75/107) |
| 53% (42/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (41/75) |
| 71% (10/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 46% (49/107) | Return Points Win % | 44% (41/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Pedone Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 1-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
J. Struplova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-2 7-6(2) | ||
QF | W | 6-7(10) 6-4 6-0 | ||
R3 | W | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 7-6(1) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||

G. Pedone vs J. Struplova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.87% (136/99) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.95% (160/79) |
| 56.84% (299/227) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.66% (344/205) |
| 52.94% (2491/2214) | Games Win/Loss | 54.02% (2773/2360) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 58.56% (106/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.19% (146/65) |
| 67.57% (25/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 36 | Aces Total | 201 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 286 | Total Double Faults | 551 |
| 1:41:15 | Average Match Time | 1:46:55 |
| 443.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.68 |
| 77% (11321/14667) | 1st Serve % | 67% (10652/15968) |
| 54% (6149/11321) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (5917/10652) |
| 45% (1505/3346) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2403/5315) |
| 52% (1068/2066) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1184/2349) |
| 50% (7226/14553) | Return Points Win % | 51% (8011/15810) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.32% (114/75) | Challenger W/L | 64.76% (136/74) |
| 56.41% (22/17) | Futures W/L | 82.76% (24/5) |
| 58% (134/232) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (157/234) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 54% (19/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (36/57) |
| 51% (30/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (48/71) |
| 85% (144/122) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (144/132) |
| 15% (144/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (144/12) |
| 15% (91/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (95/29) |